* We are trying to be an Ed Tech company, but salaries still seem based on publishing standards. I couldn't find a qualified employee for an open position that also would accept the salary we were offering.
* My yearly bonus is not tied to how successful my product is - but how the company does as a whole. So, even if your team works hard to make a successful release cycle, we end up with the same bonus as everyone else.
* Our merit increases are not incentivizing. With our yearly merit increases ranging from 1-2%, our yearly goals have no really impact on anything. Even if you exceed or greatly exceed your annual goals, merit increases aren't allowed to exceed the 2% company average (e.g., the increase you get for just doing your job). In my group, there is also no clear pathway for career advancement beyond waiting for someone to leave.
* Our strategies seem unclear more often than not - we're either working at a break-neck speed to hit an aggressive deadline (because the strategy was figured out so late in the game) or we're waiting for a strategy and told to 'enjoy the downtime'. I'd much rather that we're working at a more even pace, rather than these peaks and valleys.
* There seems to be a lot of siloing of group - despite the corporate idea of encouraging collaboration. So, the product management team will set up strategies without any of the insight of the content developers - who, at least in my group, have an extremely in depth knowledge of the content. In one case, when the content team was eventually informed of the strategy, we pointed out a pretty significant structural hurtle in the plan that left the product team scrambling to come up with something new. While we've been told that we're just content developers and we should let the product managers sink/swim based on strategy, I wish we were encouraged to help the whole group succeed - even if that means acting outside our traditional roles.