The organization struggled with accountability, particularly among less‑seasoned managers who operated with inconsistent standards and clear favoritism. Decisions and recognition often felt politically driven rather than performance‑based, with managers taking credit for others’ work, repackaging ideas as their own, or publicly praising certain team members while overlooking others who contributed equally. Communication was another significant challenge—one manager relied almost entirely on text messages, avoided phone calls, and was frequently unresponsive. In addition, substantial resources were spent sending inside reps on travel, creating inefficiencies and raising questions about how budgets were prioritized. These issues collectively made it difficult to trust leadership or feel supported in delivering high‑quality work.