Getting worse - Engineering Canonical Employee Review

2.0
7 Nov 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Smart engineers to work with - Decent starting pay - Good work-life balance (but this varies depending on the team and really bad for some teams) - Company-paid travel for twice a year

Cons

- CEO micromanages every employee (yes, *every* employee to extent it's physically possible) - Rest of the management are sycophants who'll say 'yes' to anything & everything the CEO says and have no backbone - CEO operates in binary. Either you *love* everything about Canonical or you shouldn't be working for canonical at all. You're expected to resign if you disagree with anything - The recruitment process is ridiculous. Except a few, everyone knows it's long-winded and isn't any better than the rest of the industry. Not only that, it's clearly a discriminatory in nature (disabled, non-native English speakers, women, etc will find it tougher to succeed in both the interviews and the company) and is designed to target upper-middle class white men who "fit the culture" - There's push to kick out older employees and hire mostly graduates/associates so that they can hire more for less - Pay raises are non-existent, so negotiate well when/if joining - Too many "managers" in the company now. They each try to do some weird stuff because they need to justify their existence - Little to no chance for career progression - Very high attrition rate and the CEO actually likes it so that he can hire cheap labour

Explore other reviews about Canonical

5.0
18 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

very good. happy so far

Cons

could be better, like the time of application to final round

2.0
23 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Met some interesting people, had some interesting conversations.

Cons

Was constantly hearing bad stories about upper management. I only experienced the CEO expressing minor annoyance and paranoia a couple of times. My line manager always seemed to be treading water, fixated on dev-ops ceremonies, and didn't respect the opinions of his peers. The guy who was the "expert" for my field practised management by spreadsheet and was completely out of his depth, always obsessing about his approach to the work and inflicting his opinion on everyone else. Spent too much time having to plan for travel or hear about everyone's travel plans. Wasted so much time in the company's ongoing recruitment drive which pushes most of the work of interviewing and filtering candidates onto regular employees.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All