employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

BioBridge Global

Is this your company?

This ship is sinking :-( - Anonymous employee BioBridge Global Employee Review

1.0
8 Dec 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

We have a new VP of HR and a new CEO!

Cons

Unfortunately, some departments do not believe in team work. Managers have favorites, Some managers tell your personal business to the team when you are out of the office sick. So, when you come back to work, your coworkers are asking you how to do you feel because the boss told them you were out sick or you had a doctor's appt. (not professional at all). The 2016 Employee survey is still horrible, employees are still not engaged (the company didn't reach its goal of employee satisfaction on their annual employee survey). Last year (2015) the survey was extremely low, so the past CEO decided to select 1 person to be the chair of 5-6 useless employee engagement committees. These committees were suppose to change everything. The only thing I can recall is, the Customer service committee had 1 week of activities (the company went all out and provided every employee a note and 1 tootsie roll (it said, 'Customer Service, that's how I roll'). Another committee, had its first Folk life Festival (that was okay). Then there was a Halloween contest , ASPIRE video contest. Unfortunately, this fun only last for 30-60 minutes and not everyone can attend because either your manager says the department is too busy or the activities are only held during the day and we have 2nd shift and 3rd shift employees. So guess what, the 2016 employee morale is still low. The real focus should be on Management and not solely on the worker bees. People are promoted without proper management training, annual performance evaluations are too cumbersome and the goals are not accurately aligned to the current situation of the business unit. People (the lower level employees -Techs) are overworked and underpaid.

avatar
BioBridge Global Response
9y
Thanks for your observations. Rest assured that the organization takes all feedback seriously. As far as our managers are concerned, we have training programs in place for new managers, and they all are encouraged to participate. But realize that they are human, too, and need time to develop in an organization that is evolving the way BioBridge Global is. While employee engagement isn’t where we would like it to be yet, changes that have gone into effect in the last 12 months – and will continue for the foreseeable future – are addressing concerns expressed in the last two employee surveys. This includes ASPIRE, which is well on its way to incorporating a deeply held set of values into everything we do, including the hiring process, annual evaluations, rewards and recognition, and special projects and events. Those events, by the way, are designed to boost employee engagement and recognize employees’ hard work, as well as provide a way for employees to hear from company executives twice a year. More efforts are in the works to make sure second- and third-shift employees are included in special events, and to communicate more effectively with both those employees and those who work outside our main offices. Are we where we want to be yet? No, but the ship isn’t sinking, either. Everything that has been done in the last 12 months is moving BioBridge Global forward, and taking all the employees forward as well.

Explore other reviews about BioBridge Global

5.0
11 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've worked with them for a little over a year and my contract was extended. They are a great team and very communicative.

Cons

Honestly haven't had any issues. Highly recommend.

1.0
8 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission is compelling on paper, and many of the individual contributors genuinely care about the work and the people it’s supposed to serve.

Cons

There is a significant disconnect between stated values and lived reality. While the organization positions itself as people-first, internal practices often suggest otherwise. Concerns about workload, burnout, and psychological safety are acknowledged verbally but rarely addressed meaningfully. Leadership decisions feel inconsistent and opaque. Patterns emerge where the same individuals are repeatedly rewarded while others are quietly pushed out, often under the guise of “performance” without adequate training, support, or feedback. This creates an environment where employees learn quickly that survival depends more on proximity to leadership than on competence or integrity. HR functions more as a risk-management arm of leadership than as a neutral resource for employees. Raising concerns can result in isolation, deflection, or subtle retaliation, which discourages honest communication and erodes trust. Despite the nonprofit / mission-driven framing, the internal culture often mirrors the worst aspects of corporate environments: silence over accountability, optics over repair, and high emotional labor with little protection for the people doing it.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All