Excellent colleagues, but lack of transparency from leadership - Consultant Beyond20 Employee Review

2.0
1 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I very much so enjoyed working with my colleagues. Everyone was a team player and worked hard to get the projects done, constantly going out of their way to make sure new members felt supported and lending a helping hand when people would get stuck. For the most part, the majority of the employees at Beyond20 are all very nice people who genuinely care about each other both on a professional level and a personal level. There are some bad apples, but it's impossible to work somewhere without even a couple difficult personalities. Professional development is also big at Beyond20. If you want to get an industry certification, they will make it happen for you! I will say though, that if they need a minimum number of industry certifications to be listed for an RFP, they will sometimes pressure people to take exams before they are ready in hopes that they get enough passes to meet those quotas.

Cons

Work life balance is non existent here if you are on a billable project. The billable work always takes priority, which is common with consulting and not unique to B20, but there is a mentality that if you are not 100% billable at all times (even when you have non-billable work assigned) or over 100% billable, you are in danger of being cut. There have been a lot of staffing changes over the last year which also include lay offs and leadership and management had a difficult time being transparent with their employees even though we have asked for it time and time again. Many employees, not even billable ones, are working 60-80 hours per week for months on end to make sure that leadership and management know they are dedicated to the company, in hopes that they too will not be laid off. At all staff meetings the employees who work 60-80 hours per week are celebrated and praised (as they rightfully should be for their hard work), but it is spoken about with an attitude that 40 hours per week is not enough and the only suitable answer is to work evenings and weekends to support the company. Another example of a lack of a work life balance is the way meetings are scheduled. Instead of hiring more resources (because they cannot currently afford to do so) so the work can be appropriately spread out, many employees are in 8-9 hours of meetings on top of the work they need to accomplish. Meetings are consistently scheduled at the start of business, past close of business, over lunch breaks, and one all staff meeting is held every single Friday at the end of the day for the final 30 minutes . Overall, transparency is something that leadership struggles with. The company is going through lots of changes including company restructures due to financial issues resulting in lay offs, changes in processes for operating procedures, and partnership programs with the products the company works with. With change there is always growing pains, but the biggest growing pain at this company is the fact that no matter how much we work to grow and change there is no clear messaging given to employees. When layoffs (or any staffing changes be they firings or resignations) happen, only select teams are told and the rest of the company is left to learn about the changes through either the rumor mill or LinkedIn posts. Leadership constantly promises to "do better" but doesn't provide examples of what they will do with their actions to follow through with that, only empty words. There is no direction given to those who remain on how to address the staffing changes with clients either, creating confusion on what can be said and what cannot. Another example relates to our partnership programs. There was a period of time where our consultants were locked out of a partnership portal for one of the companies we work with due to a breakdown in communication regarding contracts. Leadership was well aware of the consequences that were being delivered to Beyond20, however this was hidden from employees and only disclosed when enough employees received communication that Beyond20 was purposefully blocked from the partnership portal. This resulted in a chain reaction of consultants being unable to work tickets for their customers without knowing the reason behind the issues and the creation of extra work to investigate the issue when leadership was already aware of the root cause.

avatar
Beyond20 Response
4y
Thank you for your message. We don’t always get everything right, but we do strive to be extraordinarily transparent with our team, and we actively solicit feedback. Unfortunately, it seems that transparency may have led to some incorrect assumptions here. We have never exclusively cared about NPS numbers, have implemented specific changes to our communication protocols as a result, and are working to improve every day. I won't address all points here, however, I do want to address the subject of employee training and certifications. You correctly note that we invest in talent development at Beyond20 – it is a core value here. That means fostering opportunities for training/certifications as well as providing career paths for growth. If we have an otherwise qualified internal candidate for a proposal effort, we will generally support the career development of that person by paying for them to get a supporting certification rather than hiring externally. We also encourage (and pay for) a wide range of personal and professional development endeavors – Beyond20 has paid for everything from public speaking classes to programs at Harvard Business School. Our highly trained and certified team is a market differentiator for Beyond20 precisely because competing firms do not invest in talent development like we do. It bears repeating – it’s a core value here. We hope you’ll look back on your time with Beyond20 as a valuable part of your career progression, and we wish you the best in your current and future endeavors. Erika, CEO, Beyond20

Explore other reviews about Beyond20

5.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have a great group of people to work with. The company also generally keeps employees informed on what the sales pipeline is looking like.

Cons

The standard cons of most consulting firms. Things like project churn and juggling multiple projects and go live dates.

1.0
1 Jul 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You receive a paycheck from the company.

Cons

Leadership loves to talk about "startup mode" and "getting to the next level" especially in interviews, but this framing conveniently ignores that the company is 20 years old. They have been doing ServiceNow work since 2019. The "startup" language isn't about building something new; it's honestly a cover for chaotic processes and a lack of accountability. There's also a pattern of role exploitation. BAs end up doing the bulk of BPC level work, literally everything except client workshops. Then BAs get let go once requirements and user stories are gathered, right before the value of that work is realized. Similarly, TCs are handed a lot of what should be Architect level responsibilities, without the title, pay, or authority that comes with it. When something goes wrong, it's the BA or TC who takes the blame, even when the root cause traces back to Architect or BPC level decisions they had no control over. There is no real collaboration here, and no culture of building each other up. It plays out more like high school than a professional consulting firm with cliques, gossip, and territorial behavior instead of teamwork. New hires, the ones actually hired to modernize and improve things, are treated as threats rather than assets. Longer-tenured employees have entrenched themselves and stay protected almost no matter what, while newer folks get pushed out through ridicule, exclusion, or engineered performance issues, until they either leave on their own or get managed out. Directors openly criticize each other and individual contributors. It's not subtle, you'll hear one director dismiss another's technical competence, which does nothing but erode trust and morale across the org. C-suite is aware. This isn't a blind spot, it's a known, tolerated pattern. Nothing changes because nothing has to when you can overlook the lack of talent and professionalism for the folks who are more tenured, and hire in people that know what they're doing, and then fire them.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All