Weekly payments but has zero respect for freelancers - Freelancer Babel Audio Employee Review

2.0
25 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Pays weekly -Sometimes offer bonuses

Cons

- They never establish how long a project will take. -Projects end out of the blue zero notice or with one day of notice. -If you have good feedbacks you get more tasks, but there are throttles where they reduce tasks up to 10% for indetermined time. - The demands for audio quality are very high. They want studio quality, zero background noise, echo, reverb or muffled sound. If you have any of these issues you get a flag and many flags make you loose tasks, until you are kicked out of the project. -Offer Bonuses but there were ocasions in which they were not paid correctly and it took a while to convince the team there was an error. -Communication is a nightmare: The Bonuses calculations are explained in a very confusing way. When asked at the community chat QA´s nthat coordinate the projects offer mistaken information or simply do not know how it works. - QA´s are the only point of contact you will have and they often have zero information regarding projects continuity -The pay rate for the exact same job is different depending on your location. Usually higher for USA and lower for Europe. They also decrease pay rates during projects that already started.

Explore other reviews about Babel Audio

5.0
27 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

All on your free time.

Cons

Not enough work given per week

1.0
17 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The pay rate itself is real, $17.50 per recorded hour on the entry tier, and the work format is genuinely as described when the technical gatekeeping isn't actively working against you.

Cons

The equipment requirements to pass their audio and video check are never disclosed before you apply, so you find out what you actually need only after you've already invested time trying to qualify. I purchased a webcam, a USB headset, and an ethernet adapter, all on direct recommendations from their own admin team, specifically to meet requirements that were never listed anywhere up front. After doing everything instructed, their internal pre-check still failed me on network jitter while an independent, third-party speed test, the exact one their team told me to run, showed results well within their own stated requirements at the same time on the same connection. When I asked for clarification, I was sent the same templated response twice, word for word in every technical paragraph, containing a factual error where my download and upload numbers were reported backwards. Neither time did anyone catch the error before sending it again. When I pointed out the contradiction directly, I was lectured about my tone instead of given an actual answer. The standards aren't strict, they're internally inconsistent, and the burden of proving your equipment and internet are good enough never lifts no matter what you fix.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All