employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Avaaz Foundation

Is this your company?

A toxic cult - Anonymous employee Avaaz Foundation Employee Review

2.0
2 May 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote working, very talented co-workers, relatively unlimited resources for good ideas, and depending on where you live pay/vacation days are better than average.

Cons

Since the Avaaz leadership is now actively reaching out to former staffers for "diverse, honest and helpful reviews", I decided to write one that fulfils these criteria. What started off as an exciting job, with some of the most talented people I've ever met, slowly descended into a toxic cult that threatened the very humanity of the people working there. There’s a concept at Avaaz called the "judgement gap" that implies the higher up the chain someone is, the better judgment they have. And that doesn't only apply to campaigning, it applies to life. So in the case of the CEO, he takes the best decisions on everything, period. That, of course, includes the board. Any decisions they take can be overruled by the CEO, because they ‘respect the judgment gap’. If you disagree on anything you put yourself at risk of being told you're triggered or that you have a problem with hierarchy. The Avaaz management team are experts at gaslighting — it’s the basis of their whole management system and leads to systematic silencing of critical thought. If you raise feedback on something as simple as a campaign process you might find yourself having to discuss childhood trauma that might ‘explain’ why you’re reacting to it in this way. It’s part of the culture for management to ask inappropriately personal questions or make assertions to explain why it’s just you that feels a certain way. In the last few months, the CEO has spiralled totally out of control, as a result since the start of this year nearly 20% of the Avaaz team have resigned, including half the senior management team. The CEO has a messiah-complex and is now trying to turn the organisation into some kind of spiritual movement with him at the centre. And he’s willing to do it at all costs and has said he’d happily lose 70% of the team if it meant that the people around him were 100% committed [to him]. Avaaz has so much potential and is/was full of talent, but to consider applying there now, you’d have to be in the market for a guru and be prepared to totally submit yourself to his every whim.

Explore other reviews about Avaaz Foundation

5.0
30 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong team culture vibe interesting

Cons

some campaigns can be rushed

1
1.0
30 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people you work alongside at Avaaz are genuinely some of the most talented, passionate, and creative individuals you'll find in the advocacy and campaigning space. The collective intelligence and commitment in the room is remarkable. You will learn a great deal. You'll be pushed creatively, exposed to global issues at a serious level, and surrounded by people who genuinely care about impact. If there is one thing Avaaz gives you, it's resilience: you develop it out of necessity, and the colleagues who go through it with you become a real source of strength. The mission, at its core, is still worth believing in.

Cons

The organisational culture is deeply dysfunctional, and the gap between Avaaz's public values and its internal reality is wide. Leadership is dominated by men who concentrate informal decision-making power amongst themselves, and this filters down into everyday dynamics in ways that are hard to ignore. Women's voices, regardless of seniority, are routinely talked over or dismissed on calls; ideas that come from female staff are frequently credited to male counterparts, and the leadership circle remains stubbornly male-minded despite the organisation's progressive external positioning. Senior leadership operates with a strong sense of exceptionalism - the unspoken belief that the importance of the mission excuses how people are treated internally. There is a well-established hierarchy of "judgement" that discourages dissent and creates a culture of fear around speaking up. Strategic direction shifts chaotically, priorities change without explanation, and accountability for poor behaviour amongst senior staff is virtually nonexistent. Multiple people have raised concerns over the last few years with little to no consequence for those involved. For women and people from underrepresented groups, this environment is particularly taxing. The cognitive dissonance of fighting for equity in the world whilst experiencing the opposite inside the organisation is exhausting and, over time, genuinely demoralising.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All