please don't work here - Front End Developer Art.com Employee Review

1.0
4 Feb 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

these people are not pros. they are hacks. if you appreciate a condescending, critical, hypocritical, insulting, closed minded workplace with highly opinionated undertalented and uncooperative middle management that stereotype employees this place is for you.

Cons

- middle management make it impossible to complete tasks. questions will be answered with insults and criticism. - if you get frustrated because management is making it difficult you will be reprimanded for having a bad attitude. - if you make suggestions concerning how processes could be improved, you will be told that it is not within the scope of your job description. - there is no career path or interest in promoting employees. employees put their time in and leave. - litigation and confrontation are embraced more than cooperation and collaboration. - there is no way to defend yourself. managers, hr, and middle management support each other. the smallest of petty issues become huge drama. even if you have supporting documentation to prove that circumstances for which you are being held accountable for were either not you fault or beyond your control, as in you were in another country at the time of the incident, resolutions are a one-way, their way or the highway kind of street. there is no help from team members. - upper management and entire departments disappear without a trace. - employees are absurdly underpaid. - the sign says art.com but they really just sell a bunch of Jimi Hendrix posters. if you actually know something about art, you will be ignored.

Explore other reviews about Art.com

1.0
2 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worth noting that the parent company, Trends International, operates with a completely different culture, one built on genuine respect and care for its people. That distinction matters and should not be lost in this review.

Cons

The Chief Digital Officer does not know that Instagram and Facebook are both owned by Meta. That is not a minor knowledge gap for someone in that role. That is a disqualifier. It gets worse. This person largely functions as a puppet for a behind-the-scenes operator who holds real influence without any accountability or relevant e-commerce experience. That operator is herself protected by ownership that is equally disconnected from digital commerce. The result is a chain of unqualified people making consequential decisions while anyone who actually knows the business is sidelined. Under this leadership, Art.com has managed to lose ground in a category it once owned. Consistent revenue decline is the legacy being built here, and the people responsible have faced zero accountability for it. HR cannot be trusted. If you advocate for your team, raise legitimate concerns, or simply refuse to go along with something that is wrong, you will be punished for it. Full stop. There is no advocacy just another example of an unqualified individual in a pivotal role. The toxicity here is not incidental. It is structural and it flows directly from the top.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All