Exceptionally Poor Upper Management - Sr Software Manager / Architect Angi Employee Review

1.0
30 Apr 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The previously Handy leadership is a brotherhood. If you’re lucky enough to get invited in your experience will be distinctively better than those who don’t.

Cons

I have never seen a company this large ran so poorly. The communication across product verticals and down to the development teams is abysmal. Layoffs are frequent and sneaky. People just disappear from slack one day with zero acknowledgement from leadership. Most “underperformance” is a direct result of poor leadership and calloused upper management decisions that have no regard for the people it impacts. Engineering leaders are hyper critical and distrusting of anyone outside of the brotherhood. Micromanagement is a common practice of Angi leadership, and it is not uncommon to have the failure of imposed leadership decisions placed on the teams. I have seen entire teams removed for “performance” when a subpar leader failed to properly plan and allocate resources. The upper leadership tries to run a large organization like Angi as if it were the small startup for which they are all most familiar. The result is chaos, and is a Petri dish for germinating mental and emotional burnout for their engineering groups. The Tech Bro attitude is rampant among leadership who appear to be attempting to recreate the concept of boy kings the industry tried to get away from after Zuckerberg. Since the Angi merger in 2021 the percentage of diversity in the Angi engineering group continues to trend down. Management skills are not a requirement for management positions, and often candidates with poor leadership skills but considered technical are prioritized over candidates with significant leadership abilities but viewed by the brotherhood as less than in technical abilities. Middle managers have almost no say in the direction of their own teams and are often not consulted before staffing changes or compensation amounts are finalized. Engineering Managers are expected to stay relevant at a principal engineer level of technical aptitude while sitting in meetings for the majority of their time. The dichotomy of these expectations results in a stressed out middle management who have little time to spare for the teams they were hired to manage. If anyone is paying attention to the meteoric decline of Angi this is a great case study on how to destroy three companies at once while lining the pockets of those responsible for their destruction.

avatar
Angi Response
2y
We're genuinely sorry to hear about your experience. We strive to uphold the highest standards of professionalism and efficiency in all aspects of our business and your feedback is invaluable to us. Please know that we take your concerns seriously and are continuing to invest in our leadership and their development. We appreciate your candor and hope to have the opportunity to restore your faith in us in the future. If you have any further feedback or specific concerns you'd like to share, please don't hesitate to reach out to us directly at HR@Angi.com.

Explore other reviews about Angi

5.0
17 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’m impressed with leaderships focus and direction and the way it is turned into tactical items. I feel like my work builds towards the companies goals.

Cons

The stock market hates us right now; what you gonna do?

avatar
Angi Response
2mo
Thank you for the review! We are thrilled to hear that our focus and direction resonate with you and that you feel your work directly contributes to our company goals. Regarding your feedback on the market, while we can't control external factors, we are fully committed to executing the strategic plans outlined in our recent all-hands. By continuing to focus on Jobs Won Well, we remain confident in our ability to drive long-term value and success. We’re glad to have you on the team!
2.0
29 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The culture is generally positive, and leadership is accessible. Management is willing to meet with employees and listen to concerns. There are talented people throughout the organization, and the work can be rewarding if you enjoy sales and helping businesses grow.

Cons

The biggest challenge is the compensation structure. The company promotes uncapped commissions, but many employees feel earnings are effectively controlled through continually increasing quotas and changing performance targets. Revenue and nominal goals are adjusted so frequently that it can feel like the finish line is always moving. What's particularly frustrating is that the majority of the sales team often struggles to reach 100% of quota, yet goals continue to rise. This creates the perception that compensation expense is being managed through quota increases rather than by allowing top performers to fully benefit from the revenue they generate. Over time, this can discourage high achievers. Employees who consistently perform well are often expected to deliver significantly more results each year just to maintain the same level of compensation. When exceptional performance is met with ever-increasing targets instead of proportionally increasing rewards, motivation suffers.

1
avatar
Angi Response
1w
Thank you for taking the time to leave a review. We are glad to hear that you find management accessible and enjoy working alongside the talented individuals across our team. We also hear your concerns regarding our compensation structure and quota adjustments. Our goal is always to balance company growth with fair, motivating, and rewarding compensation for our sales team. Your point about the importance of consistency and transparency in goal-setting is well-taken. Thank you again for helping us identify areas where we can improve.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All