employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged employer

Great products, Great people. - R&D Software Engineer Agilent Technologies Employee Review

4.0
2 Jun 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The legacy of Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard is alive and well within Agilent Technologies (which spun off from HP in 2000). Our products are best in class across the life sciences and electronics industries from DNA microarrays to network analyzers. In general, employees demonstrate a high level of innovation and focus on building quality products. The working environment is comfortable if you don't mind the cubicles. Compensation and benefits are generous. I would highly recommend Agilent Technologies as a place to work if you can manage to land a job offer and you're interested in the test and measurement industry.

Cons

Since the telecom bust in 2001, Agilent has been focused on keeping the company lean and profitable. As a result of this, hiring in the U.S. has been very limited even though we are growing headcount rapidly in Asia. The prospects of low growth within the U.S. has diminished morale somewhat and raised concerns about an aging domestic workforce. One of the less exciting aspects of working for a large company is that there are quite a few legacy products that are still in support mode and require some degree of attention even though most everyone would probably prefer to be working on new technology.

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
21 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My team and I like being in a company doing good in the world. Can advance my career.

Cons

Pace is flat out and looks like it will stay that way. It’s hard to look at better ways to work when people are stretched trying to get something done then move to the next

1
1.0
15 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great products that help scientific researchers

Cons

The enterprise comms dept is awful. A toxic environment marked by instability and burnout. Long‑time employees are pushed out, new hires leave, and the culture is defined by fear rather than collaboration. The core issue is the leadership. Limited enterprise‑level experience and a lack of emotional intelligence have created a culture of micro-managing, reactive decisions, and psychological insecurity. Instead of providing clarity and strategic leadership, the leader fuels confusion, distrust, and exhaustion. The result is a dysfunctional department where morale is low, workloads are unsustainable, and employees feel unsafe speaking up.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All