A highly toxic place led by incompetent management - Anonymous employee ASEF Employee Review

1.0
16 Oct 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ASEF has a nice garden, a few kind colleagues can be found, and the HR department although limited genuinely tries to support staff and be helpful wherever they can.

Cons

Avoid working in the Digital Transformation, Finance, and Communication Departments unless you are comfortable with a highly stressful, inefficient work culture and hollow “standards” masking incompetence. Communication dept in particular it’s a joke: working here means learning that commas, dots, and endless nitpicking matter more than strategy, expertise, or results. The leadership of this department mistakes micromanagement for “high standards,” creating constant stress and wasting the team’s time with pointless demands. Everything is exaggerated into drama and wrapped in an inflated sense of importance. Staff are treated more like personal assistants than working professionals — expected to drop everything for managerial whims, take on menial tasks, and tolerate late-night scolding messages or arbitrary denial of even short leave requests. Expertise is routinely dismissed, as the department’s management — despite clear incompetence — always believes it knows “better.” Her so-called 'expertise' seems limited to endlessly rewriting paragraphs by hand, while basic tools like copy-paste, ChatGPT, or simple office software appear to be beyond her knowledge. Tasks that should take a few hours often drag on for weeks. Likewise, routine meetings that could be wrapped up in 30–45 minutes regularly stretch into 2-3 hours. Even small mistakes can provoke sarcasm, public scolding, or other forms of disrespectful behaviour. Salaries are already low for Singapore, yet team members are requested to follow a strict on-site schedules (9 a.m.–6 p.m.) with lunch often shortened due to constant made-up work pressure and unnecessary overtime. Unlike in most workplaces where team lunches are common, people here often prefer to eat alone trying to recover from the constant stress. Many also quit within a year. The general office atmosphere is equally unpleasant: most people seem to dislike their work, stay only due to visa constraints or lack of alternatives, and genuine friendships are rare. As other reviews have mentioned, ASEF suffers from a lack of effective leadership and strategic vision — a recurring issue across departments.

Explore other reviews about ASEF

1.0
16 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Exposure different culture and projects, stakeholders and partners

Cons

If you value meritocracy, transparency, and basic professionalism, think carefully before joining the Executive Office. In my experience, decision-making was driven by personal loyalty and sycophancy rather than measurable performance and track-record, and formal guidelines on promotion were treated as optional when they became inconvenient. Promotions and recognition often appeared disconnected from documented outcomes. Processes that should have required objective criteria, consistent scoring, and HR-aligned checks were handled informally, with shifting rationales and post-hoc explanations. The result was a workplace where talented people spent more time managing politics than delivering results, and where doing excellent work did not at all translate into fair opportunities. The culture strongly rewards flattery. The fastest way to “shine” is not to exceed targets or demonstrate leadership, it’s to stay agreeable and servile, offer constant praise upward, and avoid raising legitimate concerns. People who ask for clarity, evidence, or adherence to policy may find themselves quietly isolated, mischaracterised, or blamed for issues they didn’t create. A final caution: be careful around senior “gatekeeper” who controls executive office access, messaging, and narratives around leadership. In my experience, they are highly skilled at reframing events, triangulating colleagues, and shaping perceptions while maintaining plausible deniability. Treat conversations as transactional, keep everything in writing, and document decisions meticulously for your own good, never trust the gatekeeper. Overall, I would not recommend working in this office unless you are comfortable operating in an environment where optics outrank substance and where policy compliance depends on who benefits.

1
4.0
2 Feb 2026
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Colleagues were generally alright overall.

Cons

Need to travel a little bit for meals.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All