Nothing Special, No Value Adds - Anonymous employee 1 Source Employee Review

1.0
22 Feb 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Convenient HQ location, one stellar contract, two fantastic PMs that have a lot of knowledge to share.

Cons

Starting from my initial interview, I was lied to. I was told that the company held very specific certifications, which was not accurate. When I started, I was often told that the information I needed existed "somewhere on the SharePoint" which was often untrue. I was told there would be bountiful evidence of stellar past performance references...a lie. If you interview for this role, ask about their CPARS. You won't find any leadership here. Over six months or so, there was a significant brain drain. It seemed to be a growing pattern of scapegoating for issues the owner was responsible for. These critical team members were not replaced, nor did the owners realize that they were critical. Frankly, this company is not prepared to fight through this market. I would not go back to 1 Source, or recommend that anyone work there.

Explore other reviews about 1 Source

5.0
28 May 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management is supportive of employees career

Cons

Some employees giving bad rep need to be let go

1.0
19 Jun 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The first 30 days are great. On-boarding feels smooth and welcoming, masking deeper dysfunction. Leadership presents a highly positive front, which later gives way to less transparent dynamics.

Cons

Based on my experience and conversations with former colleagues, many issues raised in earlier reviews persist. Top performers continue to leave, leaving teams understaffed and scrambling to meet deadlines. The CEO’s erratic decision-making—such as abrupt schedule changes with less than 24 hours’ notice—creates constant upheaval, forcing employees to rearrange childcare and personal commitments without support. Favoritism runs deep: family members and close associates receive flexible terms, while others face punitive reactions for similar requests. The company hasn’t landed a significant contract in over three years; rather than address outdated management practices, leadership deflects blame onto individuals, publicly scapegoating former staff during interviews. This blame culture erodes trust and deters new talent. Unless there is a genuine strategic and cultural overhaul, morale will keep plummeting and attrition will persist. Prospective employees should be wary of joining without clear evidence of fundamental change.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All