Dual Entry Reviews

2.5

38% would recommend to a friend

(16 total reviews)

33% positive business outlook

Dual Entry has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 16 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there.

Reviews by job title

16 reviews
5.0
17 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I see a lot of negative comments here, so as an employee, I can't just stay aside. I have been working here for quite a long time, and there have been different moments, but overall, I would say that this company is one in a million. The work here is pretty intensive, but the good part is that you will never go unnoticed. All of your efforts will be rewarded. It is not the corporate bullsh*t when you have been working hard for years and now you have a 5% promotion with a 4% yearly inflation rate. And also I see how actively this company is changing. All the feedback from employees is actually making an impact. Another part worth mentioning is the engineering team. I am a software engineer in this company, so I can tell for sure developers here are very talented people with great soft skills. Somehow, this company was able to assemble a team of exceptional people. I am really grateful to this company for the opportunity to work here, and I can see how it actually can grow.

Cons

There were many cons, but to be honest, I am not even sure I would do something different there. People are complaining about some bad management decisions, but the problem is that there was a situation where the only decision that could be made was a bad one or an even worse one. After all, we should remember it is a startup company that is playing in a huge game.

1.0
14 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary is the only one I can think of

Cons

They treat people like robots. The company culture is non-existent. Founders publicly praise employees on Slack for working weekends and putting in excessive hours, which creates an unhealthy expectation around work. The TA Manager is the biggest micromanager I have ever worked with. She has no trust in her recruiters, constantly double- and triple-checking everyone's work multiple times a week and even calling people out publicly on Slack. Her behavior in team meetings often borders on abusive. She regularly asks employees to justify why they did not hit their targets and responds to feedback with comments like, "That's not good enough, do better." One candidate I was working with was rejected simply because he needed to take one hour during the day to pick up his children. The expectation is that employees must be available all day, every day, with no regard for personal responsibilities. The engineering team lacks a clear and consistent hiring evaluation process. There is no alignment on what they are actually looking for in candidates, resulting in many rejections based on vague feedback such as "doesn't raise the bar" or "not good enough." In many cases, the candidates were actually stronger than some of the interviewers assessing them. You suggest some areas of improvements, but nothing ever changes. There is absolutely no work-life balance. The company frequently throws money at problems instead of addressing the root causes, while expecting employees to compensate through longer hours and increased pressure. Ultimately, I left because I genuinely felt uncomfortable recruiting people into this environment.

1.0
8 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Market Need: The market is absolutely ready for a modern, AI-focused ERP, and the product was conceived at the right time and place. Talented Core Team: The foundational team was solid. There were many motivated, ambitious professionals with deep ERP experience who genuinely wanted to deliver a better approach to the market. Most of which have moved on

Cons

Inexperienced Leadership & Hype Culture: The founders lack an understanding of the ERP space. Instead of building a great product, leadership focuses on silly marketing schemes to ride the AI hype wave. Product vs. Marketing Disconnect: What is communicated in marketing vastly differs from actual product capabilities. This constant over-promising and under-delivering has caught up with the business, leaving a lack of happy customers or "real" references. Zero Vision or Culture: Startups are grueling, and employees need a clear vision and a sense of value to push through. Here, that was non-existent. Foundational employees felt undervalued and utilized merely as tools for the founders' personal exit strategy. Losing to the Competition: Because the market need is so high, competition is fierce. There is no sign that the company is keeping up; the gap between DE and the competition widened daily due to a complete lack of care for the product, employees, and customers.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 16 Reviews

Glassdoor has 18 Dual Entry reviews submitted anonymously by Dual Entry employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Dual Entry is right for you.