2.8
37% would recommend to a friend
Jennifer Johnson
31% approve of CEO
36% positive business outlook
Pros
It is a remote friendly environment
Cons
Lot of call volume and emails.
Pros
Calibrate’s business model revolves around advising law firms to professionalize and avoid being run by people without business acumen. Ironically, the CEO has acknowledged having no operational, financial, or leadership expertise and is making it up as she goes… it shows. - Remote, so there is a small amount of flexibility. - The work itself can be exciting at times. - Some coworkers are great to work with, but the high turnover, frequent structural changes, and constant micromanagement by the CEO make it hard to count on a consistent team culture.
Cons
- Leadership lacks direction and consistency, and does not have the knowledge or experience needed to run a company. - Turnover!!! Despite demanding extreme loyalty from staff, the company has lets go of employees for what are clearly financial reasons (including those who have been there for years). - Decisions that directly affect employees (such as changes to benefits or pay) often feel rushed and are announced with little to no explanation. - There is essentially no room for career growth or development. - Structural changes are frequent, disruptive, and usually poorly planned (e.g., hiring and then firing a COO within the same year). - The company’s financial struggles are obvious and directly affect decision-making, morale, and retention.
Pros
- The company offers a fully remote work environment and strong benefits, including health coverage, PTO, and your birthday off. - Great opportunity to learn about the legal industry - Had the opportunity to work in several incredibly talented people
Cons
There are notable challenges that prospective employees should be aware of: Leadership structure is highly top-heavy, creating significant inequities between executives and junior staff. Promotions and recognition often appear to be driven by favoritism rather than merit, and while the company claims to support work-life balance, overtime and weekend work are frequently expected. Junior employees are held to high standards of accountability for mistakes, while leadership is often excused from similar expectations. There is also a lack of a clear competency framework, which has resulted in unqualified individuals being placed in leadership roles. Senior leadership frequently relies on junior employees to handle basic tasks, exposing gaps in expertise at the top. High turnover is a recurring issue, with employees being terminated without notice and new hires brought in arbitrarily. Leadership often avoids accountability, and operations staff are repeatedly hired and fired without clear reasoning. Another significant concern is the absence of an HR department, leaving employees without a safe or structured avenue to voice concerns or seek support. This, combined with constantly shifting team structures and compensation models, contributes to an ongoing sense of instability. While the company outwardly promotes a culture of “support” and “collaboration,” the internal experience often feels inconsistent with these values. Additionally, there have been instances of mishandling candidate and client relationships, which raises ethical concerns and impacts the company’s reputation. For those considering a role here, it’s worth approaching with caution and asking thoughtful questions about leadership expectations, team dynamics, and long-term stability. Understanding these dynamics beforehand can help ensure that the opportunity aligns with your professional goals.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.