1.0
3 Sept 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook
Pros
There are some nice people that work there
Cons
Overworked, lack of leadership, lack of training, unorganized, no growth potential, no work-life balance, most employees unhappy
58% positive business outlook
Pros
There are some nice people that work there
Cons
Overworked, lack of leadership, lack of training, unorganized, no growth potential, no work-life balance, most employees unhappy
Pros
Nice product, thats about it
Cons
Overworked and underpaid, horrible leadership
Pros
Pretty flexible depending on what department
Cons
Leadership and management was pretty political
Pros
Creatively Challenging work, work life balance
Cons
lack of vision, poor leadership at country level, poor implementation
Pros
Working with the entertainment worlds biggest license.
Cons
Zero process structure. Bad senior leadership.
Pros
great licenses working with apparel samples
Cons
Cold, uncaring management, no collaboration between departments, every man for himself mentality, work life balance non-existent, ridiculous low-ball salaries, no incentives for innovation, toxic work environment, ignorance regarding typical creative industry practices, non-caring attitude towards employee morale Bioworld is a prime example of a company that started small, quickly became profitable, but evolved only in size and revenue and nowhere else. There is next to nothing progressive or forward thinking about this place. I stayed way too long because I loved the licenses I worked with and thought I could truly be a valuable contributor to the company, but after almost a decade of service I have nothing to show for it except a portfolio of my own creation and the feeling I should have invested my time elsewhere. They are vampires because they will literally suck the life out of you and when they’ve drained you dry they will simply hire a a cheap newbie to take your place. Of course this applies to everyone EXCEPT upper management, which is why nothing ever changes for the better because the captains of the ship always stay the same. Some of these captains I might add, started working with Bioworld right out of college and are STILL THERE 20+ years later… with no industry experience whatsoever, yet they hold extremely important positions within the company. In the creative industry this is completely asinine as it is common to bring in new talent every 3-5 years for roles such as these to prevent stagnation and gain fresh insight. Know that if you work for Bioworld you will be nothing more than a set of hands and your key role will be to research your competitors and basically copy what they are doing for next year’s production calendar. Got some new ideas you think are worth pursuing? DON’T BOTHER. They claim to have their finger on the pulse of the industry and to really value creative input from their employees but in reality they provide no incentives for you to bring anything new to the table and if you do, you will often be ignored and sometimes reprimanded for being off task. Any efforts to go above and beyond will not be noticed or rewarded but any mistakes you make will be highlighted and addressed. Length of tenure and devotion to the company also has no bearing on how valuable you are viewed as an employee as your status will be the same as the new hire right next to you. I have seen people with years of service be let go by Bioworld with little more than a bat of an eye. These employees were denied severance, unemployment, and commissions. This company is petty, and will fight tooth and nail to not have to pay, even to the point of lawsuits. Managers are often promoted from within, no doubt because that way they can keep from paying according to industry standards by offering a measly wage increase to someone often already underpaid, and won’t have to train someone new who will no doubt expect a fair salary. Sadly, no consideration is taken to ensure the creative directors are fit to properly motivate and lead their teams as promotions are based on reliability and productivity and NOT character, so there is often mistrust, toxic leadership, having employees spy on each other, and a lack of consideration when it comes to work/life balance. They used to have a dual-review process once a year where employees would review their directors and vice-versa but they did away with that years ago. So in reality how does upper management ever really know how well their leaders are performing and more importantly how well they are treating their employees? People with families are expected to have no lives outside of work and if you happen to need support or understanding you will be judged and penalized (albeit covertly). People with disabilities, neurodivergent, etc. take note. You will not be accommodated and your best bet will be to keep your disability a secret. HR WILL NOT HELP YOU. Take my advice and DO NOT WORK for Bioworld. If you think I’m just a disgruntled ex-employee then notice how they are literally ALWAYS HIRING. If that’s not a red flag, then what is?
Pros
The company prides itself on culture, and the team I worked with was great and was great to commiserate with. I also earned a lot of travel benefits through what the company's attempted goals were.
Cons
There was not leadership. Ultimately if the senior management allowed their employees to work at a reasonable pace, with a workplace that was led by logic instead of whims of what senior leadership wanted the company would be a lot larger and further along. Logic and process were so lacking in this company.
Pros
The break area is nice and the office facilities are very modern
Cons
No one knows what they're actually doing and the ones making decisions aren't qualified.
Pros
Over all fun company with fun events and cool products
Cons
Rude management Lack of communication and leadership No real goals for growth
Pros
Depending on the department you worked in, you could have the opportunity to travel. Have the opportunity to work with high level clients and form lasting relationships on the external side of the business. Tons of experience was gained even if it meant figuring out 90% of the job and practices on your own.
Cons
Poor management led to a high turn over rate, and jobs were consistently outsourced to save money. Training was nearly non-existent and it was literally the sink or swim mentality. Too much work (often times the work of 2-3 people's responsibility onto one) which forced late hours at the office to finish last minute projects with far too little pay. The leadership was uninspiring, and it created a toxic work environment for seasoned and new employees. Departments were often downsized to cut on costs, and off loaded too much work onto one individual with little to no extra pay/benefits to absorbing another's workload. Massive layoffs at least (3) times a year.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.