Recruiter reached out, was very nice, pitched the role and the company, told me next steps would be phone interviews followed by onsites and some presentation. First phone interview was standard, knowledgeable guy with all standard pm type questions. Next phone interview was with the hiring manager, minimal pm questions, was mostly interested in my domain knowledge, which I didn’t have much of. I tried my best but AI guess it wasn’t a fit.

I was contacted by a recruiter through LinkedIn for a Director level PM role. At Tanium the PM groups are not all organized the same, in this case I was not going to be managing a team (despite the title), but would have potential influence over other more junior PMs. I passed a phone screening with the Recruiter, basic information only. I was then passed to a Hiring Manager who had some high level PM questions and some insight on Tanium's position as an Endpoint Vendor. They definitely saw themselves positioned MUCH stronger then the remainder of the market and didn't seem to believe they had a lot of "improvement" to make in the Product. This was a RED FLAG immediately for me. After the initial Hiring Manager conversation I was put in front of (2) additional PM Directors for 1-1 interviews. Both of these interviews were very unstructured and tended to focus on highly-technical Endpoint driven product improvements. One interviewer asked for my opinions on a Product and ways to improve; after brainstorming and providing some options he actually took time to disagree with me and pick-apart my answer because "he knew the product very well." Generally speaking the process was not well organized and the interviewers were quite seat-of-their-pants in Q/A. I then heard nothing back from Recruitment, despite false promises that they would communicate. STEAR CLEAR OF THIS PM TEAM. They are very immature or going through a lot of challenging changes at a minimum.