I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding my recent interview experience for a position within the Procurement and Construction Departments. My experience was highly irregular and suggests a significant lack of internal coordination and professional standards. Specifically, I would like to highlight the following points: Misrepresentation of Vacancy: After multiple rounds of interviews with the Manager and VP of Procurement, it became apparent that a defined role did not actually exist. Inviting a candidate to interview for a non-existent position is a poor use of professional resources. Lack of Interview Preparation: During the second phase of the process, I met with the VP of Construction, who appeared to have no prepared questions or a clear understanding of why the meeting was taking place. Inconsistent Communication: While the initial feedback was overwhelmingly positive and encouraging, the lack of follow-through and the disorganized nature of the subsequent steps were contradictory and unprofessional. I believe these practices reflect poorly on the company’s employer brand and merit an internal review. I hope this feedback serves as a catalyst for improving the recruitment pipeline and ensuring that future candidates are treated with the transparency and respect their time deserves.

-Phone interview with Procurement manager -Zoom interview with same manager & Senior agent -In person interview day: Met back-to-back for 30min each with head of Sales, Marketing, and VP of construction. Then met for an hour with same manager & director of Procurement. -In person interview with Division president This was all over the span of about 3 weeks. I then did not hear anything for 2 weeks after, until finally was told they offered it to the other candidate after narrowing it down to the two of us.