I applied in-person. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Panasonic (Gennevilliers)
Interview
> CV + LM
> Entretien direct avec les manageurs, durée d'environ 2H.
> Cherchent à casser et déstabiliser le candidat. Pas de discussion et d'échanges de qualité.
> Entretien à sens unique => Les manageurs oublient aussi qu'un entretien sert aussi au candidat!
>Pas de rencontre RH, du coup le poste ne semblait pas très bien défini....
>Petit exercice pratique entre 2 produits à comparer => idée interessante de faire ça en entretien mais consignes floues de leur côté....
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Questions sur son ancien poste? Donner des infos chiffrées.
Pourquoi avez-vous fait cette école?
Vous avez fait quel bac? => Oui oui ça remonte très loin
Qualité/Défaut.
Pourquoi Panasonic ? Décrire cette entreprise en 2 phrases?
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Panasonic (Mississauga, ON)
Interview
Interview was with a 2-person panel with a series of questions from each member of the panel. Some of the questions were phrased as statements, making it difficult to determine what they were actually asking. There was minimal interaction or feedback from the interviewers, so you could not readily assess how your interview was progressing.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
Where 2 things have equal prioritization, and with a demanding customer, how do you choose which one to do, and why?
It was awkward because it was a video conference as opposed to in-person. A higher positioned person entered the meeting late, did not turn on their camera and out of nowhere chastised me for leaving my former company. This person expected blind loyalty for life apparently.
The interview occurred in Lake Forrest, Ca. A small part of Orange County, CA. The interviewer arrived late and frantic. I waited around for a call back, reached out to the recruiter, waited, reached out to the hiring manager who was surprised that HR had not told me...I was over qualified.