The interview process was rather negative due to the fact that the two interviewers that I met with didn't seem to have an accurate idea of what I was interviewing for when I arrived there, neither did they seem to have an idea of what my credentials were, and I noticed this from the (scripted) questions they asked that were easily answered from spending a couple of seconds on my resume and/or cover letter. I initially applied for a "Student Behavioral Assistant" position only to find out by the time of interview that I'm applying for "anticipated openings" for not only Student Behavioral Assistant, but also for Teacher Aide and Substitute. The actual interview was quite unnerving due to the fact that the interviewers had their eyes "bolted" to the sheet of scripted questions from which they were asking me; there was very little eye contact from their end primarily because they were focused (intensively) on writing my responses down. Now, I can understand they are probably required to write the answers that applicants provide, but when this consists of the entirety of the interview, and you're the interviewers spending most of that time with your eyes directed to sheets of paper, then that's concerning and it tells a lot about interviewing skills. My suggestion for improving this is to have the interviewers "more socially connected," and especially more "aware" of the applicants they are speaking with prior to and during the interview process, especially when it comes to their resumes and cover letters. Deviate from the script; try to make it more conversation while keep it formal; have the "interviewers" actually look at an applicant's resume and/or cover letter before setting up an interview, that way, neither of us would waste our time. Overall, it was one of the most disappointing interviews that I've attended so far in my life, and it's truly a shame considering I would have enjoyed working with this organization and providing the help that students attending their programs require.