This company's practices were an insult to my intelligence. I was contacted to schedule testing one night for a position that had been open for more than thirty days. (Yes, the email was sent at night.) I responded with time preferences and received an email the next morning (shortly after the start of business hours) that said they had received a lot of applications from more qualified applicants in the meantime. I responded because that obviously didn't happen. In return, I was told that the recruiter who sent that email was not in the same office as the position and had no responsibility for filling the position, and therefore they still were interested in keeping my candidacy going. They also said they were "investigating" how the rejection was sent. I tested the next week; hours before my test started, they re-advertised the position. I took the test anyway, not expecting anything to come from it. The test itself was not as advertised. What was advertised was four questions that would test my foreign language skills. It turned out to be two items in English (testing my knowledge of the company and its products), one writing exercise in the foreign language, and a translation. Only one of the "questions' was a question. And did I mention that the test sheet had a couple of grammar errors on it? If you're testing my writing, please show me that you have enough knowledge of writing to compose something correctly without the stringent time limit that is placed on test-takers. I hope they have a good writer evaluating these tests. The expected rejection letter came a few days later and it contained more writing issues. I responded to ask for feedback and was told that none could be given, "as you expected," an expectation I had never expressed. I did apply for a second job there right after receiving the final rejection just because I qualified for it and like the company's product (and need a job). Indeed runs a good website, but its HR practices are among the worst I've come across.