Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Hewlett Packard Enterprise | HPE as 80% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Sales and Research Intern rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Sales and Process Associate roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at Hewlett Packard Enterprise | HPE takes an average of 14 days when considering 5 user submitted interviews across all job titles. Candidates applying for Service Sales Manager had the quickest hiring process (on average 14 days), whereas Service Sales Manager roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 14 days).
I interviewed at Hewlett Packard Enterprise | HPE (Chennai)
Interview
They asked me to Tell me about my self and behavioral questions and a group discussion and some basic questions. It is usually 3-4 rounds starting with online exam then group discussion and finally hr interview.
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Hewlett Packard Enterprise | HPE in Jun 2026
Interview
Had an unprofessional experience interviewing at HPE. After the interview was completed (which actually went really well) I did not get any closure on the result. When I asked recruiter about the outcome I was told that they are waiting for update from hiring manager but that update never came. It is unprofessional to not close the loop with the candidate considering the fact that candidate has put time and energy into the interview process.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
About past projects, handling customer escalation etc. Nothing difficult at all. Not sure if they had already made a decision to hire someone else.
I applied online. I interviewed at Hewlett Packard Enterprise | HPE (Sydney) in Apr 2026
Interview
I recently interviewed for a leadership position with HPE and, initially, the experience was positive. After progressing through interviews and engaging with mutiple recruiters from Korn Ferry who were managing the recruitment process, I was advised that I was considered a strong candidate for the role.
Unfortunately, the experience deteriorated significantly after the interview stage. Despite several polite follow-up attempts seeking an update on the outcome of the process, I received no response whatsoever. To date, I have been completely ignored.
What I find most disappointing is not the outcome itself—recruitment processes are competitive, and not every candidate will be successful. Rather, it is the lack of professionalism, courtesy, and basic communication shown throughout the stages of the process. Candidates invest considerable time preparing for interviews, engaging with recruiters, and making themselves available throughout the selection process. The least they deserve is a timely update, even if the news is not favourable.
Throughout my career, I have interviewed with many organisations, ranging from small businesses to global enterprises. This is the first time I have experienced being completely "ghosted" after reaching such a stage in a recruitment process. Every other organisation has provided transparency, closure, and constructive feedback, regardless of the outcome.
For a company with HPE's reputation, and particularly for a leadership-level opportunity where professionalism and respect are expected values, this experience fell well below the standard I would anticipate. How an organisation treats candidates is often a reflection of its culture, and every individual whether successful or unsuccessful—deserves to be treated with dignity and respect.
I hope HPE and its recruitment partners review their candidate communication practices to ensure future applicants receive the courtesy and professionalism that should be standard in any recruitment process.