I was approached by the recruitment team on LinkedIn and I conveyed my interest in pursing this opportunity. For the first round, the recruiter briefed about the process and asked me 20 one word answer technical questions(Data Structures, Programming language, Database, Networking, etc.). It was depending upon this round i.e. how many questions I answered correctly to decide if they want to proceed with the further rounds. I was promptly informed about the decision that I cleared this round and they would want to proceed further. For the next rounds, another HR took over the process and explained me the further rounds and scheduled my first technical round and briefed about the topics which will be covered in it. He had also sent me a detail email about it. The first an hour technical round was divided into four parts - Unix shell scripting, Web technology, Coding and Generic technical questions. The interview went as planned. First, interviewer told me write a script which consists of files. (Don't recall the exact problem statement.), second it was a scenario based problem statement for web technology and need to provide a solution with justification, 3rd was a coding round with a problem statement and 4th was generic technical questions on computer science. I was later informed that I cleared this round and they would proceed further to next round. The second technical round was an hour long coding exercise. Another interviewer gave a problem statement again based on file operation consisting of log files and need to solve it. I did my best but was 95% correct. I couldn't clear this round. The overall interview process was very good.

I have done the first stage (questionnaire) and passed. It was an ethical questionnaire with answers from Greatly Disagree to Greatly Agree. It was not difficult that being said the follow up for the rest of the interview process has been quiet so I'm just waiting, not good.