My initial technical interview involved a take-home test, on which I spent several hours. A few days after submission, I requested feedback and was told that my solution did not produce the expected results. However, I believe my solution actually yielded good outcomes, as evidenced by the screenshots I attached in a follow-up email. Unfortunately, I received no response to my clarification.

I have had a screen call with the HR manager; followed up by a take-home project. I applied best practices to the project, 95%+ test coverage parallelism, dockerized the project, etc. However, the engineer who assessed it had a lot of comments regarding small nitpicks in the code structure and reproved it from the process. After my interview, I reached out for feedback, but I was completely ghosted. For a company that prides itself on ‘world-class quality,’ I fail to see how a lack of communication and feedback aligns with that standard. To me, this reflects a culture that doesn’t truly value giving or receiving feedback—something essential for growth and improvement. If this is how they treat candidates, I can only imagine how feedback is handled internally.