I had great rounds of interviews where I could really feel the company culture coming across the interview process. That shows consistency. I made it all the way up to the 5th round (out of 7). Between interview rounds they were very responsive. As a negative point: after going through my 5th round, I had to wait longer than usual for any answers (that made me realise I may have not made it to the next round). Since I did't get any replies I had to reach out to them for news, and only then they got back to me with the news I didn't make it. Overall, my experience was good, but I wish they had been as reactive when everything is going well, as when they need to communicate candidates who are no longer of they're interest.

At first, I had a skype interview with 2 Front End Developers. We were talking about my previous experience, how I prefer to work, what I like and don't like and etc. In general, the interview went well and I got positive feedback in a few days. The next step was a technical task, that they asked me to complete in 3-4 hours. I had to create an application that connects to some public API, shows information to the user and gives him a possibility to filter the results. I sent my test the very next day and get the feedback in a week. The feedback was negative by pointing out UX/UI issues, the absence of Authentication and ErrorHandling and some concerns regarding chosen technologies. The other good comment was is like "There is no real case to use this application. Why would I want to use this ?", taking into account that the has been done according to their specification. And while in general, I agree with most of the comments provided to me, I don't really think that it is possible to create a fully developed application with in 3-4 hours. In conclusion, this hiring process seemed to be really odd, and I rather happy to be rejected on this stage.