Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Midwest Technical Inspections

      Is this your company?

      Midwest Technical Inspections Reviews

      2.7

      15% would recommend to a friend

      (5 total reviews)

      Robert J. Carr, Sr.

      32% approve of CEO

      15% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      3.0

      Diversity and inclusion

      2.8

      Work/Life balance

      2.3

      Compensation and benefits

      2.1

      Culture and values

      2.0

      Senior management

      1.5

      Career opportunities

      Reviews by job title

      5 reviews
      4.0
      18 Jan 2024

      Slowly Adapting to Change

      Premium auditor
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Working remotely. Contractor pay. New audit managers are great.

      Cons

      Premium audit is not their specialty and until recently it was reflected in management, which is slow to change or adapt to staff needs. Contractor pay for auditors, no benefits. No comraderie.

      3.0
      30 Mar 2015

      Great people to work with, money, not so great.

      Field inspector
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Work from home with minimum supervision. See interesting businesses, meet people, travel your state, home at night. Good work if you don't need much money.

      Cons

      Many miles on your car with no regular mileage reimbursement. Jobs are spread out too far. More jobs out of town than in town. Reports are very time consuming after you visit the location.

      avatar
      Midwest Technical Inspections Response
      10y
      Field inspectors receive commission-based pay; they are paid per inspection and their mileage reimbursements correspond to whether their inspections are in urban, suburban or rural locations. We also do reimburse separately for travel outside the inspectors' regular territory. It is important to schedule trips effectively, to take advantage of our office resources, and to complete the reports promptly in order to maximize earning potential.
      2.0
      12 Mar 2014

      Contingent Part Time Reviewer should be the real job title

      Loss control report reviewer - part time
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Plenty of time available to find a real job, especially when first hired as you are limited to 25 hours per week of work. If there are not enough inspections coming in, you are sent home with no hours worked.

      Cons

      Production standards are unrealistic: 3.4 billing hours for each hour worked without missing any mistakes, which is hard since contractor inspectors have variable abilities to do quality work. If the software was easier to work with, and inspector turnove wasn't so high, this standard would be more realistic. Even though the number of inspections in the queue are low, they still advertise for more inspector reviewers, which doesn't promote job security for existing inspectors.

      Viewing 1 - 3 of 5 Reviews
      Related searches: Midwest Technical Inspections jobs | Midwest Technical Inspections salaries | Midwest Technical Inspections benefits | Midwest Technical Inspections interviews
      ReviewsMidwest Technical Inspections reviews

      Glassdoor has 19 Midwest Technical Inspections reviews submitted anonymously by Midwest Technical Inspections employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Midwest Technical Inspections is right for you.