Nice place to work - Computer Programmer iRacing.com Employee Review

5.0
9 May 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's a small company with some good minds in charge. Development goals are made clear, as is the direction the company is going in. Very experienced coworkers, and the lead programmer is a very good, friendly mentor. Regular release schedule makes for a comfortable work pace. Feedback from individual employees is valued and considered. Nobody is too high up to talk to, and you'll get to know most folks over lunch. Good feedback is given, and management decisions always felt fair. Hard work is rewarded with promotion.

Cons

Programmers work largely alone, it was difficult to get code and design reviews — mainly because complete competence is assumed. The technologies I used there aren't very transferable.

Explore other reviews about iRacing.com

5.0
22 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Slow stable growth. Very experienced team. Business casual.

Cons

Very large old codebase difficult to maintain and disorganized. Quarterly release schedule creates a low but constant pressure to deliver.

4.0
24 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the studio is its overall stability and business approach. Compared to many places in the industry, it has maintained steady growth, solid partnerships, and a culture that supports a healthy work‑life balance. Compensation is competitive for the industry, and while benefits vary from company to company, the overall package is above average for a U.S.‑based studio. Another major advantage is the sense of long‑term security. The studio has a track record of avoiding the volatility that affects much of the industry, thanks in large part to consistent leadership and a well‑managed business strategy.

Cons

Some teams could benefit from stronger support structures and clearer communication practices. In certain areas, issues raised by team members don’t always receive the level of follow‑through or coordination needed, which can be challenging in a remote‑first environment. When communication gaps appear, it can affect trust and make collaboration feel more fragmented than it should be. This may vary across different groups and projects, and the experience is not necessarily uniform throughout the studio.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All