↳
12
↳
You can suppose there are n people in the room and think of them in a row. The first one has to shake hands with (n-1) people (because he doesn't have to shake hands with himself). The second one has already shaken hands with the first one, so he has (n-2) shakes remaining... and so on. So you have to sum: (n-1)+(n-2)+(n-3)+...+1= (n/2)*(n-1) Then you have to solve (n/2)*(n-1)=66 and you get n=12. Less
↳
n(n-1)/2=66 so n=12
↳
17/44 of the stock with variance of .3 and 27/44 from the stock with variance of .2 Less
↳
No, if you can short, the variance could be reduced even further since the stocks are correlated. Less
↳
Above answers used variance in portfolio variance equation, rather than std. Answer is .386 for security with var .3, and .613 for security with var .2 Less
↳
I mean it is not correct (but probably I do not have got true): 1 hour A can make 20% (1/5) B can make 12.5% (1/8) A+B can make 32.5% (1/5 + 1/8 = 13/40) The work will be finished at 100% (1) 1 hour - 32.5% (13/40) x hour - 100% (1) x = 1*1/(13/40) = 40/13 = 3.077 (hours) tha half of the equation was good, but: 8 = X + 1.6*X = 2.6X; -> x=8/2.6) Please post a comment if I do not have true!!! Less
↳
40/13
↳
http://brainteaserbible.com/interview-brainteaser-andy-and-ben-working-together
↳
I detailed my CV and what relevant subjects I could teach. Also went through my demo. Less
↳
I wanted to teach Urdu
↳
To implementing the policies and plans developed by the top managers
↳
By Ito W^n is a martingale for n=0,1
↳
Xt is a martingale you get f(Xt) is a martingale if f is linear otherwise convexity or concavity will increase or decrease the expectation, think of Jensen inequality. Less
↳
Agree, for any n>1 you get a drift term
↳
25/3
↳
sorry, should be 25/3
↳
169/16
↳
ln(root 3)
↳
ln(3)/2
↳
Reaching back to high school, I'd say -.5
↳
sqrt(2)-1
↳
0: it is an undercritical process.
↳
(1+p+p^2+p^3)/4 = p So p = sqrt(2) - 1.
↳
P(dying out)= \sqrt(2)-1
↳
It's not very hard.