Cover image for Jane Street
Logo
See All Photos

Jane Street

Engaged Employer

Jane Street

Add an Interview

Interview Question

Quantitative Researcher Interview

-

Jane Street

Game: I throw 1 die 4 times, trying to reach at least one 6, you throw 2 dice 24 times and try to reach at least one double 6 (6,6). Who has greater chance of winning

Interview Answers

10 Answers

9

To estimate, compare (5/6)^4 and (35/36)^24 this is 5/6 and (35/36)^6 this is 30/36 and (35/36)^6 notice that 30/36 is missing six 1/6th from 1 (36/36) and taking powers of (35/36)^6 will reduce the number by nearly 1/36th each time, but less than than, so that (35/36)^6 is greater than 1-6/36=30/36. Therefore the probability of not getting any double six is greater than probability of not getting any 6, and you should choose to roll one die. To understand the reasoning, think about taking powers of 0.90, 0.90^1 = 1-1x0.10 0.90^2 > 1-2x0.10 0.90^3 > 1-3x0.10 and so on

Deen on

8

It all comes to which is greater: 1-(5/6)^4 or 1-(35/36)^24. They will expect you to calculate this (which is greater, not actual numbers) without a calculator.

Anonymous on

1

First comment is correct, second comment is wrong since it asks for at least one 6 or at least one (6,6). This also includes the outcomes 2 or more sixes or double (6,6). Hence the easiest way of calculating this is by calculating the complementary probabilities P(no six) and P(no double six), respectively, to get P(at least one six) = 1 - P(no six) and P(at least one double 6) = 1 - P(no double six), which gives the result in the first comment.

Anonymous on

0

I agree with the Deen's answer. Just to add up, basically if 1/36 is constantly decreased six times, it is equal to decreasing 1/6 one time. However, each time you decrease 1/36, the total size shrinks, so the next 1/36th decrease is smaller than 1/6. Therefore, 35/36^6 is greater than 5/6.

Student on

0

I agree with the Deen's answer. Just to add up, basically if 1/36 is constantly decreased six times, it is equal to decreasing 1/6 one time. However, each time you decrease 1/36, the total size shrinks, so the next 1/36th decrease is smaller than 1/36. Therefore, 35/36^6 is greater than 5/6.

Student on

0

Bernoulli's inequality: (1-p)^n > 1-np (35/36)^24 = ((1-1/36)^6)^4 > (1-6/36)^4 = (5/6)^4 so 1-(5/6)^4 > 1-(35/36)^4, i.e., choose the first option

blah on

0

@Try again, 1 - (35/36)^24 = .4914 So you get the opposite answer... "1-(5/6)^4 or 1-(35/36)^24. They will expect you to calculate this (which is greater, not actual numbers) without a calculator." Is there a standard way of estimating this?

bob on

2

First answer is correct. Also comparing the too probability is easy. You just need to compare (35/36)^4 and (5/6)^4. Write 35/36 = (7/6)*(5/6) > (5/6) as 7/6 > 1 So, 1-(35/36)^24 < 1-(5/6)^4 Hence I will prefer atleast 6 option in 4 rolls.

zooboo on

0

The first comment would be correct if you needed to get a string of 6's, probability from 4 rolls of one 6 is 4/6 (4 * 1/6), probability of 6 and a 6 is 1/36, rolled 24 times = 24/36, so they are both the same odds.

Anonymous on

1

(7/6) (5/6) > (5/6) but you have to compare [(7/6) (5/6)] ^ 24 vs [5/6] ^ 4 which you might be able to guess is smaller than (5/6) ^ 4 Just for the record 1 - (5/6)^4 = .5177 1 - (35/36)^24 = .5192 so you should take the option of rolling double 6 in 24 rolls if you feel like winning

Try again. on

Add Answers or Comments

To comment on this, Sign In or Sign Up.

Jane Street Careers

Cover image for Jane Street

A closer look into the roles of trading and technology offers a sense of life at Jane Street. Work at Jane Street is exciting and...More

  • Careers
  • Benefits
  • Around the Office
This is the employer's chance to tell you why you should work for them. The information provided is from their perspective.